INVEST Act passes in the House with momentum toward the Senate

INVEST Act passes in the House with momentum toward the Senate

Author:

The Carta Policy Team

Published date:

12 December 2025

The House passes the bipartisan INVEST Act to expand access to private markets, as the SEC shifts leadership and regulatory tone, and the White House pushes to preempt state AI laws through executive action.

Topline

INVEST Act clears the House with strong bipartisan vote

The House of Representatives passed the INVEST Act this week with a decisive 302-123 vote. Despite a last minute progressive push, 87 Democrats joined Republicans to advance this legislative package that will broaden access to capital for more founders and fund managers across the country and provide more Americans the opportunity to benefit from growth and diversification in private markets.

Here’s why it matters to the innovation economy…

More capital. The INVEST Act will promote broader access to capital, particularly for founders and fund managers in underserved markets by:

More investment opportunities. The INVEST Act will enable more individuals to benefit from the growth and diversification benefits of private markets by:

More liquidity. Not only does the INVEST Act increase liquidity by allowing more VCs to participate in secondaries, it also contains provisions to make it easier for companies to IPO, lowering barriers and reducing costs for companies to enter and remain in the public markets.

Engagement matters: Carta and our Innovator Alliance partners have been working over the past year to educate, shape the contours, and engage the broader innovation community to build consensus. In advance of the floor consideration, Carta led a coalition of 27 organizations from across the country and across the ecosystem in support of the INVEST Act. To be clear, we do not get this result without this engagement, but we need to amplify it to push these important policies over the finish line in the Senate. And it will take the entire stakeholder community to make it happen.

SEC Commissioner Crenshaw to depart SEC with words of caution for private markets

SEC Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw—the agency’s sole Democrat—is set to depart the agency when her term ends at the beginning of January, though she is not doing so quietly. In several appearances this week, Crenshaw outlined a series of concerns about the agency’s current direction and the implications for investor protection and market integrity. For private capital, here are the highlights:

Bigger picture: The larger issue is the growing politicization of independent agencies and what this means for market participants having to navigate the resulting regulatory whiplash. The Supreme Court has signaled it is prepared to expand presidential influence over independent agencies, further raising the stakes. While the Commission’s current posture is focused on deregulation and modernization, Crenshaw’s concerns signal a roadmap of issues for a future Democratic majority to address, now with the political and legal cover to act more aggressively.

Engagement matters: This is why it is so important to build a sustainable framework based on industry best practices that can survive political shifts. Congress and the legislative process will become even more critical to providing certainty. That’s why the INVEST Act is so important: it modernizes key capital formation rules and creates a long-term foundation for expanding access to private markets that is rooted in statute if we are successful.

White House issues EO aimed at preempting state AI patchwork

On Thursday, President Trump signed a sweeping executive order aimed at creating a unified federal approach to artificial intelligence policy and pushing back against the accelerating wave of state AI regulation. Framed around the need for the U.S. to lead the world in AI development, the EO asserts that innovation requires a minimally burdensome and consistent national standard, and the developing state patchwork of AI laws is creating fragmentation and compliance costs that hinder this goal. The EO directs agencies to take immediate steps toward preemption, including:

What’s next: There are tight turnarounds for EO implementation. Constitutional challenges are almost guaranteed, as there is legal uncertainty over whether the president can unilaterally override state police powers without congressional directive. But if litigation does not halt efforts immediately, agencies will likely begin taking steps to implement the EO in accordance with its tight timelines.

Quick hits