As deployment rates slow, VC dry powder is piling up

Author:

Kevin Dowd

Read time:

4 minutes

Published date:

September 12, 2024

At the two-year point, venture funds from the 2022 vintage have deployed just 43% of their available capital—the lowest rate after two years of any recent vintage.

Throughout most of recent history, venture capital fund managers have tended to deploy more capital during the second year of a fund’s lifespan than in the first year.

For instance, funds on Carta from the 2018 vintage deployed 23% of their available capital in their first year of existence and another 27% in the second year. Funds in the 2019 vintage deployed 23% of their cash in year one, then another 29% in year two. For the 2020 vintage, the deployment rate was 27% in the first year and 33% in the second year. In each of these three vintages, funds deployed at least half of their capital in the first two years.

The story of the 2022 vintage, however, is very different. After one year, funds that closed in 2022 were 28% deployed, in line with recent history. Yet in the second year—which roughly corresponds to the past 12 months, depending on the specific fund’s close date—managers of 2022 vintage funds spent just 15% of their available capital, leaving them 43% deployed after two years.

It was the slowest second year for fund deployments of any vintage dating back to 2017. No other year is within seven percentage points.

Because of this sophomore slump, the 2022 vintage is now trailing all of its recent predecessors when it comes to the rate of capital deployment after 24 months. Framed from a slightly different perspective: After two years of existence, the 2022 fund vintage retains a higher percentage of its dry powder than any other vintage in recent history.

Symptoms of a slower market

At least in part, this change in deployment speed during a fund’s early days is likely a response to shifts in the broader venture market. Venture-backed valuations have trended down since the bull market’s peak in 2021. It’s grown more difficult for companies to find attractive exits. And deal counts have declined across all venture stages.

Funds that closed in 2022 aren’t the only ones that have deployed capital more slowly in the past year. As shown in the chart above, the amount of capital deployed by funds in the 2021 vintage went from 51% after 24 months to 63% after 36 months, an increase of just 12% during the period that roughly corresponds to the past 12 months. That’s less activity than we typically see in the third year. Funds in the 2017 vintage, for instance, invested about 20% of their total capital in the third year.

Why have deal counts declined and deployments slowed? Investors say that the biggest reason is a shift in their own expectations. As valuations declined and exits grew harder to find, some companies that might have easily raised funding in 2021 no longer looked so attractive. VCs grew more selective about their investments, asking for higher revenue totals and clearer paths to profitability. This increased selectivity leads to a slower pace of deals.

Investors believe that recent fund vintages might eventually produce stellar returns. But that performance is about quality, not quantity.

The difference between the 2017 vintage deploying 20% of its capital in year three and the 2022 vintage deploying 12% might not seem enormous. But in an industry where consistency and predictability are valued traits, it signals a notable shift in spending habits across the VC landscape.

Short-term shifts, long-term thinking

While fund managers do try to stick to their plans, they also have to play the cards they’re dealt. Gilani says that he would never write a check just to meet a certain deal quota that he had communicated to LPs. He also wouldn’t pass on an attractive investment solely because his fund was deploying capital more quickly than expected. To at least some degree, all VCs react to market conditions.

We can see some of this reactivity in the data. For the 2020 fund vintage, the period between 12 months and 24 months of existence overlaps with the high point of the venture market in late 2021. Over that span, the 2020 vintage went from 27% deployed to 60% deployed, spending about one-third of its available capital in just a year. That’s the fastest rate of deployment over any 12-month stretch for any vintage shown above.

But in Gilani’s view, that line of thinking is incomplete. An early-stage venture fund operates on a long lifespan, often around 10 years. It can take a long time for a single portfolio company to go from investment to exit—long enough for the exit market to go from red hot to ice cold, as it has in recent years. Or, long enough for it to heat back up again.

Plus, ramping up deployments when valuations are on the rise runs afoul of investing’s one inescapable maxim: buy low, sell high. There’s a reason that, historically, some of the best performing VC fund vintages have occurred in the immediate aftermath of market downturns.

A new home for Carta Data

Get the latest data and analysis on startup and VC trends from Carta.